reviews

Lovable: From $0 to $6.6B in 12 Months Building Apps Without Code

The Swedish startup that lets you build complete apps just by typing. NVIDIA and Google bet $330M. Is it real or hype?

AdScriptly.io Team
-January 28, 2026-14 min read
Share:
Software development interface with code and visual design

Photo by Lautaro Andreani on Unsplash

Key takeaways

A 30-year-old Swede who used to code while cycling just created the fastest-growing startup in the world. Lovable lets you build functional apps in minutes without writing code. Honest review with pros, cons, and comparisons.

On December 18, 2025, a 2-year-old Swedish startup raised $330 million in a Series B that valued it at $6.6 billion. Among the investors: NVIDIA, Google, Salesforce, Atlassian, and HubSpot.

The company is called Lovable. Its product: a platform that lets you build complete web applications by typing what you want in plain English (or any language). Without writing a single line of code.

But what really caught Silicon Valley's attention wasn't the product—it was the numbers:

  • $0 to $100M ARR in 8 months
  • $100M to $200M ARR in 4 more months
  • Valuation that tripled in 6 months (from $1.8B to $6.6B)
  • 2.3 million active users
  • Customers like Klarna, Uber, and Zendesk

It's the fastest-growing startup in the world according to multiple sources. And it's leading a movement called "vibe coding" that promises to democratize programming.

Is Lovable really that revolutionary? Or is it another case of inflated valuations driven by AI hype? After deep research and testing the platform, here's our honest verdict.

What is Lovable and How Does It Work?

Lovable is a "vibe coding" platform—a term coined by Andrej Karpathy (former AI Director at Tesla) that describes programming using natural language instead of code.

The concept is simple

You type something like:

"Build a task management app with user authentication, email notifications, and dark mode"

And Lovable generates:

  • The complete frontend code (React)
  • The backend with database (Supabase)
  • Authentication configured
  • Everything deployable with one click

Technical Architecture

Frontend: React + TypeScript (clean, professional code)

Backend: Native integration with Supabase (PostgreSQL, auth, storage)

Payments: Stripe integration for monetization

Version Control: Bidirectional sync with GitHub

Deployment: One-click to publish to production

What's interesting is that Lovable doesn't lock you into their platform. All the code is yours, synced to your GitHub repository. You can export your project anytime and continue developing it in VS Code, Cursor, or any IDE.

Figma-Style Visual Editor

One of the most useful features is the visual editor. You can click on any element of your app and modify colors, sizes, spacing, and typography without writing code or prompts.

It's like having Figma integrated directly into your development environment.

Chat Mode for Planning

Lovable has a chat mode that doesn't make changes to the code. It's for:

  • Planning your app's architecture
  • Asking questions about your project
  • Debugging errors without consuming generation credits

This is important because one of Lovable's main problems is credit consumption.

The Story Behind Lovable: From CERN to Unicorn

To understand why Lovable grew so fast, you need to know its founder.

Anton Osika: The "Contrarian" Who Coded on His Bike

Anton Osika started coding at 12 years old in Sweden. He studied physics at KTH (Sweden's most prestigious technical university) and worked at CERN researching subatomic particles.

But he left academia to join Sana Labs as their first employee. He helped the EdTech startup grow to raise $80 million and improve learning for millions of people.

His colleagues describe him as "very contrarian." He literally coded while riding his bicycle. And for two years, he ate exclusively chia pudding (yes, the same breakfast every day for two years).

In 2019, he co-founded Depict.ai, an e-commerce company that was successfully sold. But his side project would change everything.

The Open-Source Project That Exploded

In spring 2023, Anton published a personal project on GitHub called GPT Engineer. The idea was simple: a script that used GPT-4 to generate code from prompts.

Overnight, his inbox exploded.

GPT Engineer became the fastest-growing repository in GitHub history, accumulating over 50,000 stars in weeks.

Anton and his co-founder Fabian Hedin saw the opportunity. Within hours of going viral, they decided to create a company.

Lovable was born (originally also called GPT Engineer). Within weeks they had hundreds of thousands of users—many of them people who had never written a line of code.

The Mission: "The Last Piece of Software You'll Need"

Anton's vision is ambitious:

"The biggest barrier to building businesses is code. 99% of people have great ideas and can execute a business, but they don't know how to program. We want Lovable to be the last piece of software any company needs to buy."

And even bolder:

"We want to be the first European company to reach $1 trillion valuation."

Considering they went from $0 to $6.6B in 2 years, maybe it's not so crazy.

Lovable Pricing: How Much Does It Cost to Build Apps Without Code?

Lovable uses a credit system where each AI action consumes a variable amount. Here are the current plans:

Plan Price Credits Best For
Free $0/month 5 daily credits (~30/month) Testing the platform
Pro $25/month 100 + 5 daily (~150 total) Personal projects
Launch $50/month 250 messages Small startups
Scale $100/month 500 messages Medium teams
Business $50/month Same as Pro + SSO Companies with security requirements
Enterprise Custom Unlimited + dedicated support Large organizations

Student Discount

Lovable offers 50% off the Pro plan for verified students. If you have a .edu email, you can get the plan for $12.50/month.

The Credit System Problem

This is where Lovable starts to show its limitations. The credit system is a "black box" according to many users:

  • It's unclear exactly how much each action costs
  • A simple prompt can consume 1 credit or 5 depending on complexity
  • Debugging loops can burn credits without solving the problem
  • Users report "spending credits fixing what Lovable just broke"

A Trustpilot review sums it up:

"The pricing feels like a slot machine where you don't know how much each pull will cost."

Testing Lovable: The Good, the Bad, and the Frustrating

After researching reviews on Reddit, Trustpilot, G2, and Product Hunt, and testing the platform ourselves, here's our honest assessment.

What Lovable Does INCREDIBLY Well

1. Prototyping Speed

Lovable is absurdly fast for creating functional prototypes. What would take days or weeks coding manually, Lovable generates in minutes.

A user on Medium described creating a complete MVP in 2 hours that would have taken 2 weeks with traditional development.

2. Real Deployable Apps

Unlike other code generators that produce pretty but useless demos, Lovable generates actually functional apps:

  • Working authentication
  • Connected database
  • API endpoints
  • One-click deploy

3. Quality Code

The generated code is clean and professional. It uses TypeScript, modern React, best practices. It's not the spaghetti code you'd expect from AI.

4. No Lock-In

The bidirectional GitHub sync is genuinely useful. You can:

  • Export your project whenever you want
  • Edit code in VS Code/Cursor
  • Import changes back to Lovable
  • Never lose control of your code

5. Perfect for Landing Pages and CRUD Apps

For simple use cases (landing pages, dashboards, basic management apps), Lovable shines. Users report excellent ROI compared to hiring freelancers at $50-150/hour.

What Lovable Does FRUSTRATINGLY

1. Infinite Debugging Loops

The most mentioned problem in reviews: Lovable sometimes gets stuck in loops where it tries to fix a bug, creates another, tries to fix it, recreates the original... all while consuming your credits.

A user on Reddit:

"I spent 30 credits watching Lovable fight itself for an hour without solving the bug."

2. Complexity = Problems

Lovable works brilliantly for the first 70%. But when your project grows in complexity:

  • More unwanted changes in files you didn't touch
  • Harder to debug
  • More credits consumed
  • Eventually you need a real developer

As an AI engineer said on Medium:

"Lovable gets you 70% of the way there. But you'll spend a lot of time wrestling with that last 30% to make it usable for real customers."

3. Poor Customer Support

Multiple reviews mention frustration with support:

  • Chat bot only
  • Generic responses that don't solve problems
  • No phone or human support
  • One user reported getting locked out of their account with no way to contact anyone

4. Slow for Large Projects

As your project grows, each regeneration takes 10+ seconds. Users report "spending 50% of their time waiting for Lovable to respond."

5. Vague Prompts = Disaster

Lovable requires detailed, specific prompts. If you're vague, you'll burn credits with unnecessary iterations. This is especially problematic for non-technical users (ironically, the main target audience).

Lovable vs Bolt vs Cursor: Which One Should You Choose?

Lovable doesn't exist in a vacuum. There are several "vibe coding" tools competing for the same market. Here's the honest comparison:

Feature Lovable Bolt.new Cursor
Best for Non-technical users wanting complete apps Ultra-fast prototypes Developers wanting AI assistance
Learning curve Low Very low Medium-high
Speed Fast Very fast Depends on developer
Complexity supported Medium Low High
Integrated backend Yes (Supabase) Limited Bring your own stack
Included deployment Yes Yes No
Code control High (GitHub sync) Medium Total
Base price $25/month $20/month $20/month

When to Choose Lovable?

  • You want to build a complete app (not just frontend)
  • You don't know how to code or have basic knowledge
  • You need backend, auth, and database integrated
  • You want one-click deployment
  • Your project is low-medium complexity

When to Choose Bolt?

  • You need maximum speed for prototyping
  • Your project is relatively simple
  • You're testing ideas quickly
  • You want the lowest possible learning curve

When to Choose Cursor?

  • You already know how to code and want to go faster
  • You need total control over your stack
  • Your project is complex
  • You want an IDE with AI, not an app generator

The Recommended Workflow

Many experienced developers use this combination:

  1. Prototype in Lovable - create quick MVP
  2. Export to GitHub - when the project needs complexity
  3. Continue in Cursor - for serious development

It's the best of both worlds: initial speed + later control.

Why Did NVIDIA and Google Invest $330M?

When NVIDIA, Google (CapitalG), Salesforce, Atlassian, and Databricks invest together in a startup, you should pay attention. What do they see?

The "No-Coder" Market is Huge

99% of the world's population doesn't know how to code. If Lovable can convert even a fraction of those people into "builders," the total addressable market is astronomical.

Think about how many people have app ideas but never build them because they can't code. Lovable promises to eliminate that barrier.

The Growth Speaks for Itself

From $0 to $200M ARR in 12 months is unheard of. For context:

  • Slack took 5 years to reach $200M ARR
  • Zoom took 7 years
  • Notion took 6 years

Lovable did it in 1 year.

The "Last Piece of Software" Vision

Anton Osika positions Lovable as potentially "the last piece of software you need to buy." If a single platform can generate any other application you need... why buy specialized software?

It's a bold vision, perhaps too bold. But investors clearly believe it has potential.

Enterprise is the Real Prize

With the Series B funding, Lovable is pivoting toward enterprise:

  • SSO and privacy controls
  • Integrations with corporate tools
  • Dedicated support
  • Guaranteed SLAs

Companies like Klarna, Uber, and Zendesk are already customers. If Lovable captures the enterprise market, current valuations could look cheap in retrospect.

The Limitations Nobody Mentions

After analyzing hundreds of reviews, there are clear patterns of limitations that marketing materials don't mention.

1. It Doesn't Replace Developers (Yet)

Lovable is excellent for prototypes and MVPs. But for production products that scale to thousands of users:

  • You'll need to optimize code
  • You'll need security hardening
  • You'll need architecture decisions AI can't make
  • You'll need complex debugging

Eventually, you need a human developer. Lovable is an accelerator, not a replacement.

2. Supabase Dependency

The Supabase integration is deep. This is great if Supabase works for your use case. But if you need:

  • Different database (MongoDB, MySQL)
  • Custom backend (Node.js, Python)
  • Specific infrastructure

...you'll have to do significant manual work.

3. Unpredictable Credit Consumption

The pricing model is Lovable's Achilles heel. Users consistently report:

  • Much higher consumption than expected
  • Needing to upgrade plans sooner than planned
  • Frustration with lack of transparency

4. Limited Support When Things Break

When everything works, Lovable is magical. When something breaks, you're on your own. Chat bot support is insufficient for complex technical problems.

Is Lovable Worth It in 2026?

After all this research, here's our verdict.

YES it's worth it if:

  • You have an app idea but don't know how to code
  • You need a quick MVP to validate a business idea
  • You want to create landing pages or dashboards without hiring a developer
  • You're a developer wanting to accelerate prototyping
  • Your project is low-medium complexity
  • You have a budget of $25-100/month and accept limitations

NO it's not worth it if:

  • You need a highly complex app from the start
  • Your budget is extremely limited ($0)
  • You need guaranteed technical support
  • You require a specific stack different from React/Supabase
  • You don't tolerate occasional frustrations with AI

The Realistic Recommendation

For non-technical users: Try the free plan (5 daily credits). If you manage to create something useful in the first sessions, consider Pro ($25/month). If not, Lovable might not be for you.

For developers: Use Lovable for rapid prototyping, but plan to migrate to Cursor or your favorite IDE when the project grows.

For startups: Lovable is excellent for validating ideas quickly. But budget to hire a developer when you have real traction.

FAQs About Lovable

Is Lovable free?

Lovable has a free plan that includes 5 daily credits (approximately 30 monthly credits). This is enough to test the platform and create small projects, but serious projects will require the Pro plan ($25/month) or higher. Verified students can get 50% off.

What makes Lovable different from ChatGPT for code?

ChatGPT generates code snippets that you must integrate manually. Lovable generates complete, functional apps with backend, database, authentication, and deployment included. It's the difference between receiving ingredients vs receiving a cooked and served dish.

Can I use Lovable without knowing how to code?

Yes, that's exactly the main use case. Lovable is designed for people without programming knowledge. However, knowing how to write clear and specific prompts helps a lot. And for complex projects, you'll eventually need technical knowledge or hire someone.

Is the code generated by Lovable my property?

Yes. All generated code is yours. Lovable automatically syncs with GitHub, and you can export your project at any time. There's no technical lock-in.

Does Lovable work with databases other than Supabase?

The native integration is with Supabase. For other databases (MongoDB, MySQL, external PostgreSQL), you'll need manual configuration after exporting the code. It's not impossible, but it requires technical knowledge.

Conclusion: The Future of Development is Hybrid

Lovable represents something genuinely new: the real democratization of programming.

For the first time, people without technical knowledge can create functional, deployable apps with real backends. This was science fiction 5 years ago.

But we also need to be realistic:

  • Lovable doesn't replace developers (yet)
  • The credit system is frustrating
  • Complex projects still need humans
  • Support needs improvement

The $6.6 billion valuation reflects potential, not the present. Lovable is betting that in 5-10 years, programming will be as accessible as using Excel.

Maybe they're right. Maybe not.

Meanwhile, Lovable is a genuinely useful tool for prototypes, MVPs, and medium-complexity projects. If you have an idea and $25/month, there's no excuse not to try it.

The worst case: you spend $25 and learn your idea doesn't work before investing thousands in development.

The best case: you create something that changes your life.

For a 2-year-old startup valued at $6.6B, that $25/month bet seems pretty reasonable.

Was this helpful?

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Lovable free?

Lovable has a free plan that includes 5 daily credits (approximately 30 monthly credits). This is enough to test the platform and create small projects, but serious projects will require the Pro plan ($25/month) or higher. Verified students can get 50% off.

What makes Lovable different from ChatGPT for code?

ChatGPT generates code snippets that you must integrate manually. Lovable generates **complete, functional apps** with backend, database, authentication, and deployment included. It's the difference between receiving ingredients vs receiving a cooked and served dish.

Can I use Lovable without knowing how to code?

Yes, that's exactly the main use case. Lovable is designed for people without programming knowledge. However, knowing how to write clear and specific prompts helps a lot. And for complex projects, you'll eventually need technical knowledge or hire someone.

Is the code generated by Lovable my property?

Yes. All generated code is yours. Lovable automatically syncs with GitHub, and you can export your project at any time. There's no technical lock-in.

Does Lovable work with databases other than Supabase?

The native integration is with Supabase. For other databases (MongoDB, MySQL, external PostgreSQL), you'll need manual configuration after exporting the code. It's not impossible, but it requires technical knowledge.

Written by

AdScriptly.io Team

#lovable#vibe-coding#no-code#artificial-intelligence#startups#web-development#programming

Related Articles